CSRD Disclosure CheckerAmending Directive (EU) 2026/470, article by article

Directive (EU) 2026/470, Article 4(7)

Prioritisation is not a penalty trigger

In shortWhere a company has prioritised impacts in the way the Article allows, the mere fact that it has not addressed a less significant adverse impact does not expose it to penalties under Article 27. The provision binds companies that prioritise impacts. Read the source: (EU) 2024/1760, Article 9(4).

What is the requirement, in plain English?

Where a company has prioritised impacts in the way the Article allows, the mere fact that it has not addressed a less significant adverse impact does not expose it to penalties under Article 27.

What evidence does a regulator or an auditor ask for?

The prioritisation record and the reason the lower-ranked impact was not addressed in the period.

Which dates matter?

  • Transposition of Article 4 (due diligence amendments): 26 July 2028

The transposition deadline for Articles 1 to 3 of the amending directive is 19 March 2027 (Article 5). For Article 4 it is 26 July 2028, applied from 26 July 2029.

What does it cross-reference?

  • (EU) 2024/1760 Article 27

How do I check a draft against this provision?

Paste your draft into the reading. The reading returns, per provision, whether a phrase specific to this requirement appears in your own words, quoted, with the article cited here. Where a line reaches nothing it reads no mapping identified.

Not legal advice; does not certify. Every field on this page carries its own source pointer, and the record is replayed by the pages, the check and the export from one reviewed record.

Read from (EU) 2024/1760, Article 9(4), as amended by Directive (EU) 2026/470, Article 4(7), saved from EUR-Lex on 2026-10-17.